The Discount Debate: Recent PUC Rulings On Local Exchange Resale

Fortnightly Magazine - July 15 1996
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Now that incumbent LECs must offer all services for resale, state regulators must decide the appropriate level of discount for the new resale tariffs.

Discounts could put incumbent LECs at a disadvantage, since many local exchanges already price below the cost of service, particularly for basic residential access.

On the other hand, resale carriers might lose a fair chance at establishing themselves if resale rates simply reflect the current retail charge minus costs avoided by the LECs in providing the services at wholesale (i.e., individual customer billing, marketing, and customer-service costs). Also, regulators must consider other policy goals, such as encouraging facilities-based competition.

CALIFORNIA

Requires Pacific Bell and GTE California, Inc., to discount wholesale rates 17 and 12 percent, respectively. Also discounts basic service rates by 10 and 7 percent, respectively. Expects smaller approved margins to "spur the development of competing networks." Rejects LEC request for pricing flexibility, citing continuing market advantage. Re Competition for Loc. Exch. Serv., Decision 96-03-020, R. 95-04-043, I. 95-04-044, Mar. 13, 1996, 169 PUR4th 83 (Cal.P.U.C.).

EEI Annual Meeting 2024 - June 18-20

IOWA

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.