Order 888 Petitions Strong on Stranded Costs

Fortnightly Magazine - August 1996
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

About 90 parties have filed petitions seeking changes to Order 888. Claiming "errors," the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reverse its assertion of:

s Jurisdiction over unbundled retail transmission services

s "Primary" authority over retail stranded-cost recovery when retail consumers convert to wholesale

Report - Grid Investment for Medium & Heavy Duty EVs

s "Backstop" authority to provide stranded-cost recovery when an end user changes power suppliers under a state-established retail wheeling system.

NARUC asked the FERC to implement a "bright-line test," arguing that rates and terms of service for delivery of power by a utility to an end user are subject to state commission jurisdiction regardless of the identity of the party generating or reselling the power or the facilities used to transport the power. If FERC jurisdiction over retail stranded costs remains the same, NARUC asks that the FERC reconsider applying the "revenues lost" method of stranded-cost calculation.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.