Letters to the Editor

Deck: 
Fortnightly Magazine - April 2006
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

To the Editor:

In “Rate-Base Cleansings: Rolling Over Ratepayers” (November 2005, p.58), Michael Majoros urges state public utility commissions to recognize a refundable regulatory liability for past charges to ratepayers for non-legal asset retirement costs. “Unless the state PUCs specifically recognize the liabilities, the utilities will have the opportunity to institute a rate-base ‘cleansing’ by transferring ratepayer-fronted money into income.” The author’s criticism of the prescribed accounting for discontinuation of FASB Statement No. 71 (euphemistically labeled “rate–base cleansing”) is grossly misplaced.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.