An Adequate Level of Resilience

Deck: 

West Monroe

Fortnightly Magazine - September 2022
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Each year, and across the U.S. power grid, unexpected, extended electricity power disruptions cause extensive physical harm and inconvenience to communities and individuals, and billions of dollars in direct and indirect economic losses, consequences of arguably inadequate levels of electrical system resiliency.

From a distribution grid investment planning point of view, there is a yawning gap between our general awareness of the potential dangers posed by the next big storm (or other causes) and our ability to economically value its consequences. Because it's hard, and the tools we do have are imprecise, it might be getting conveniently pushed to the side. But is this prudent? 

Improving resiliency certainly isn't just a matter for the distribution grid, (concerning as it does the bulk power system and the reality of impacts to generation and transmission assets). The resiliency valuation challenges are lurking within most grid plans if we look closely enough.

There's jointness: whereas most grid plans promote improvements in order to improve reliability, such as feeder hardening, more sophisticated fuses and reclosers, and advanced communications and software, these same improvements contain a fair measure of resiliency impacting improvements at the same time.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.