Rate Design Reform

Deck: 

Listen to Bonbright, Kahn, and Behavioral Economists

Fortnightly Magazine - November 1 2018
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

The time for rate design reform is right. Utilities, regulators and others recognize that pricing is a vastly untapped source of demand-side resources with the ability to alter both consumption and peak demand.  

Changes in the utility industry such as competitive commodity markets; increased emphasis on green, decentralized and intermittent resources; and improved information systems including smart grids and meters make rate design the ready-to-pick low-hanging fruit in utility resource planning.  

Rate design reform is needed because of decades of pricing driven by accounting over economic principles and the fear of rate shock. The use of accounting allocations to set prices rather than to allocate cost responsibilities has created inefficient pricing paradigms more akin to average cost pricing than market-based marginal cost pricing.  

This accounting-based approach, coupled with a predisposition for the concept of gradualism has left consumers with inferior price signals, contributing to the existence of inefficient power systems with low demand factors and higher-than-needed bills and consumers with grid-friendly consumption patterns subsidizing other consumers. 

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.