Why Nuclear Energy is a Matter of National Security

Deck: 

Only One State Remains on the Path

Fortnightly Magazine - September 2017
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

To say that nuclear energy in the U.S. is snake-bitten, as one journalist put it recently, is an understatement. Nuclear plants are closing around the country. The new-build in South Carolina was recently suspended. 

My own state's project in Georgia, Plant Vogtle, is teetering on cancellation dependent most likely on Toshiba staying solvent and paying its parent guarantee obligations to Georgia Power. Yet the national security argument that should be made about nuclear energy is missing. Here's what I wish I heard coming out of the White House.

First, the U.S. has always prided itself in being a world leader. We built the world's first nuclear reactor, and since that time, countries around the world have looked to our country for leadership in using nuclear in safe and proliferation-resistant ways. 

As we decommission reactors and fail to replace them, the world is looking to other places, like China, India and Russia, for leadership. According to World Nuclear Association, China is increasing nuclear generation capacity by seventy percent. As the U.S. commercial nuclear declines, U.S. standards for nuclear safety and security will no longer be the international norm.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.