Facing the Death Penalty

Deck: 

Did FERC's market power ruling go too far?

Fortnightly Magazine - August 2004
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

Will utility executives and proponents of electric competition mark July 8, 2004, as a dark day? That was the day the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) said it would make no changes to the extremely contentious "interim" screen — the one it adopted back in April to measure market power in electric generation.

I say "dark" because the market-based sales now put at risk are the financial lifeblood of some utilities, especially those of the multi-billion-dollar, vertically integrated variety. Those that fail FERC's market-power test will be forced to sell their excess generation at cost-based rates — a "death penalty," according to some utility CEOs.

And to make matters worse, some advocating open markets still question whether the new test will improve competition in wholesale power transactions.

FERC's new market-power test, the critics say, offers no real incentive for utilities to join a regional transmission organization (RTO). That's because RTO membership no longer provides a safe harbor — an exemption from having to pass the market-power screen.

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.