QF Fails to Raise Avoided Cost Rates

Fortnightly Magazine - July 1 1996
This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.

The West Virginia Public Service Commission (PSC) has ruled that it is preempted by federal law from modifying the avoided-cost rate in a purchased-power agreement implemented under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA).

EEI Annual Meeting 2024 - June 18-20

The developers of a qualifying cogeneration facility (QF), Bituminous Power Partners, L.P., had asked the PSC to raise the contract rate for avoided energy in its purchased-power contract with Monongahela Power Co. Complaining of substantial operating losses and cash flow problems due to lower-than-forecasted energy costs for the utility as well as higher-than-forecasted operating expenses for the cogeneration plant, Bituminous asked the PSC to raise the current payments under the contract from 1.455 cents per kilowatt-hour (¢/Kwh), the utility's current actual avoided energy rate, to 1.9¢/Kwh.

According to the PSC, PURPA was designed to "preserve the benefit of the bargain in QF contracts for both utilities and project developers." Once state commissions approve power-purchase agreements under PURPA, "they are generally without jurisdiction to modify the terms of the agreement." American Bituminous Power Partners, L.P. v. Monongahela Power Co., Case No. 87-669-E-C, Mar. 29, 1996 (W.Va.P.S.C.).

This full article is only accessible by current license holders. Please login to view the full content.
Don't have a license yet? Click here to sign up for Public Utilities Fortnightly, and gain access to the entire Fortnightly article database online.